Monday 16 June 2014

New Routes at Mount Edgcumbe Rocks


New Routing is for me a relatively new part of my climbing. It requires a slightly different approach to that one would normally take when out bouldering. When trying someone else’s problems I would try and watch videos, get beta and send it as soon as possible. With new routes there are no videos, there is no beta, and while trying it you have no idea if it is possible. Also the speed is far slower as you need to clean the problem (new problems on southern sandstone are even sandier and dirtier than established ones – if you can believe that), find the holds (often not as obvious as you would hope!) and try and find a workable sequence. Every new route that I have done has followed a similar trend of trying what I thought was a desperate line, which I question if I can do, before I find a new hold or sequence which ‘unlocks’ the problem. It is a great part of climbing, that I am really enjoying – especially the discovery part. Last year I found a new boulder – this year I am developing a whole new crag. Mount Edgcumbe Rocks.

Mount Edgcumbe Rocks is a small crag that is mentioned in the ‘Other Outcrops’ section of the 2008 Climbers Club Southern Sandstone guide as: ‘A small outcrop on Tunbridge Wells Common, close to Wellington Rocks. A major tree clearance took place here in the mid 90s, and there is now potential for a few new routes.’ I first checked the crag out last year. At first it looks incredible, with imposing roofs jutting out above clean landings – but on closer inspection, while these faces may appear impressive, they are clearly not suitable for bouldering due to being far too sandy. It was after drawing this conclusion that I began to walk away. However, a couple of vertical walls caught my attention. The rock appeared fairly solid, and there were some interesting pocket and pebble features (very rare on southern sandstone). I made a mental note to come back after winter when the crag had dried out.

The first occasion that I got to climb here was in early April, when some of the potential problems had just about dried out. I cleaned up a nice looking groove line next to a small roof that is sadly too sandy to climb on. The climbing is centred on a nice dish feature, which is reached via some monos and pebbles, before pulling into some more pockets. This felt desperate at first, as I could get little purchase on the crucial dish. However, a lesson that I have learnt the hard way from new routing is that the holds are rarely in good condition when you begin trying to climb virgin rock. The dish needed a good dusting before it became useable. Suddenly it all became very possible, and what I thought could be a problem around the mid-sevens, ended up becoming ‘New Jerusalem’ (font 6c+). The grade could be a little stiff – I debated with 7a, maybe it is, but nonetheless the quality of the problem is excellent. Names of routes are something that I struggle with sometimes. I like to have a religious theme throughout most of my problems, and I didn’t buck the trend here. As it was the first route at a new venue that could become a great new circuit, I thought ‘New Jerusalem’ was an appropriate name – also there is a problem with the same name at Caley, and I have always thought it sounded good!


Due to a trip to Font (see last blog post) and some poor weather I didn’t get back to Mount Edgcumbe Rocks until early June. Since my last visit no one had come to try my route or to put anything up. Incredible, when you consider that this is a 10-minute walk from Tunbridge Wells train station – thousands of climbers must have driven past this area over the years. This certainly would not have been the case up North! Anyway, on my second trip I got stuck into another problem on the same buttress as ‘New Jerusalem’. On the far end of the wall there is a distinct sloping feature at head height in the shape of a smile, somewhat reminiscent of ‘Smiling Buttress’ at Curbar. While it basically forms a one-move problem I began trying to move off this feature to the top. The handholds are quite poor, but it is the lack of feet that makes this hard. Essentially, hanging the hold is relatively comfortable, but any upwards movement off it felt hard. Like ‘New Jerusalem’ the holds needed cleaning, but once tidied up it became clear that this was both possible and very good. I eventually sent it, and ‘The Smile’ (an obvious name) was born at a grade of font 7a+, although once again it will take further ascents to confirm this.


Next to ‘The Smile’ there is a shallow groove, which is fairly sparse of holds until near the top. The beginning is clearly where the difficulties are, but how to get to the holds near the top posed a problem. However, I surprised myself by sending this quite quickly. While it looks blank, the first section is balancey yet surprisingly feasible, meaning that the problem ended up being font 6b+. I named it ‘The Diaconate’, as I had just become a deacon of my church.


While there is a gap in-between ‘The Diaconate’ and ‘New Jerusalem’, this is still a project that I haven’t been able to do as of yet. Instead I turned my attention to the buttress the other side of the sandy roof. This is higher than the other buttress (which I have named Smiling Buttress – what else!), but it is similar in that it is covered in pockets and pebbles. I decided to try the easiest looking line of resistance, which goes up the left side of the wall on a very vague arĂȘte, beginning with a pull round an overlap. This was dusty even by the standards of southern sandstone (so much so that I have named the buttress ‘Dusty Buttress!) It was also very difficult to read, as there were lots and lots of similar (and fairly poor) pockets to choose from. However, I eventually sussed a sequence that involved pinching a collection of pockets and pebbles and doing a big slap to the top. This I appropriately named ‘Through the Dust’, at a tentative grade of font 6c+.


So there it is. One new crag, four new problems, and potential for at least three more quality routes - probably more. I am planning to come back soon and add some more additions, but I would be really great if some other boulderers could come and confirm the grades – watch this space!